Zürcher Nachrichten - Reverse Apartheid" in SA?

EUR -
AED 4.317194
AFN 81.101956
ALL 97.499245
AMD 451.890977
ANG 2.103509
AOA 1077.834756
ARS 1447.508047
AUD 1.788866
AWG 2.118645
AZN 1.996417
BAM 1.949435
BBD 2.37355
BDT 144.20916
BGN 1.956188
BHD 0.443103
BIF 3455.653573
BMD 1.175392
BND 1.496813
BOB 8.123477
BRL 6.37369
BSD 1.175562
BTN 100.231746
BWP 15.529297
BYN 3.847139
BYR 23037.690484
BZD 2.36139
CAD 1.594414
CDF 3391.006847
CHF 0.935236
CLF 0.028409
CLP 1090.17705
CNY 8.42216
CNH 8.427851
COP 4689.815563
CRC 593.462359
CUC 1.175392
CUP 31.147898
CVE 110.339942
CZK 24.631111
DJF 208.890999
DKK 7.461115
DOP 70.347392
DZD 152.639957
EGP 58.001852
ERN 17.630886
ETB 159.207209
FJD 2.629586
FKP 0.86286
GBP 0.86131
GEL 3.197555
GGP 0.86286
GHS 12.165345
GIP 0.86286
GMD 84.043616
GNF 10174.196361
GTQ 9.03849
GYD 245.946989
HKD 9.226807
HNL 30.771549
HRK 7.535091
HTG 154.356031
HUF 398.769509
IDR 19078.028662
ILS 3.920662
IMP 0.86286
INR 100.396729
IQD 1539.764007
IRR 49513.403353
ISK 142.410553
JEP 0.86286
JMD 187.806815
JOD 0.833353
JPY 170.485955
KES 152.207613
KGS 102.787762
KHR 4726.252344
KMF 491.314092
KPW 1057.884384
KRW 1602.910014
KWD 0.358953
KYD 0.979701
KZT 610.825669
LAK 25335.5827
LBP 105315.156011
LKR 352.678513
LRD 235.665122
LSL 20.651303
LTL 3.470628
LVL 0.710983
LYD 6.323643
MAD 10.550615
MDL 19.796365
MGA 5212.864902
MKD 61.525386
MMK 2467.391102
MNT 4214.11342
MOP 9.504568
MRU 46.659729
MUR 52.704168
MVR 18.100048
MWK 2041.071836
MXN 21.952204
MYR 4.96309
MZN 75.178066
NAD 20.651589
NGN 1803.486634
NIO 43.19542
NOK 11.833304
NPR 160.370394
NZD 1.937753
OMR 0.451943
PAB 1.175562
PEN 4.179677
PGK 4.930788
PHP 66.285103
PKR 333.752413
PLN 4.241947
PYG 9372.399337
QAR 4.279136
RON 5.05901
RSD 117.194818
RUB 92.945398
RWF 1685.512661
SAR 4.408028
SBD 9.799157
SCR 16.554512
SDG 705.821976
SEK 11.267329
SGD 1.499148
SHP 0.923674
SLE 26.387427
SLL 24647.394644
SOS 671.734839
SRD 43.706933
STD 24328.248985
SVC 10.286415
SYP 15282.193175
SZL 20.651192
THB 38.137375
TJS 11.397089
TMT 4.125627
TND 3.393944
TOP 2.752882
TRY 46.813128
TTD 7.964994
TWD 33.982356
TZS 3093.090911
UAH 49.085437
UGX 4217.230841
USD 1.175392
UYU 47.096232
UZS 14815.821182
VES 128.674315
VND 30795.280137
VUV 139.81187
WST 3.05782
XAF 653.822286
XAG 0.031909
XAU 0.000353
XCD 3.176556
XDR 0.812649
XOF 654.071261
XPF 119.331742
YER 284.621858
ZAR 20.587109
ZMK 10579.940853
ZMW 28.360404
ZWL 378.475864
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


Reverse Apartheid" in SA?




Recent claims have surfaced suggesting that white South Africans face systemic discrimination akin to apartheid, a term historically associated with the institutionalised racial segregation of black South Africans by the white minority from 1948 to 1994. These allegations, often amplified on social media and by certain political figures, point to issues such as land reform policies, farm attacks, and affirmative action programmes as evidence of a supposed "reverse apartheid." This article examines the validity of these claims, exploring the socio-political context, economic realities, and lived experiences in contemporary South Africa.

The notion of apartheid against whites primarily stems from debates over land reform. In 2025, South Africa’s government, led by President Cyril Ramaphosa, implemented a law allowing expropriation of land without compensation under specific conditions. The policy aims to address historical inequalities, as white South Africans, who make up roughly 8% of the population, still own a disproportionate share of arable land—estimated at over 70%—decades after apartheid’s end. Critics argue this policy targets white farmers unfairly, with some claiming it constitutes racial persecution. However, no documented cases of such expropriations have occurred to date, and the policy requires judicial oversight to ensure fairness. The land reform debate is less about race and more about correcting colonial and apartheid-era dispossessions, though its implementation remains contentious.

Another focal point is the issue of farm attacks, which some allege are racially motivated against white farmers. South Africa’s rural crime rates are high, with farmers of all backgrounds facing risks due to the country’s economic inequality and unemployment, which hovers around 33%. Data from the South African Police Service indicates that farm attacks, while tragic, are not disproportionately racial. In 2024, approximately 50 farm murders were recorded, affecting both white and black farmers, with motives often tied to robbery rather than race. Nonetheless, the narrative of a "white genocide" persists, fuelled by inflammatory rhetoric from figures like Julius Malema of the Economic Freedom Fighters, whose past chants of "Kill the Boer" have been widely condemned. Courts have ruled such statements as hate speech, and Malema has since distanced himself from inciting violence.

Affirmative action policies, designed to uplift historically disadvantaged black, coloured, and Indian populations, are also cited as evidence of anti-white discrimination. Programmes like Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) prioritise non-white hiring and business ownership to address the economic legacy of apartheid, where whites dominated wealth and opportunity. Some white South Africans, particularly Afrikaans-speaking Afrikaners, feel marginalised, claiming these policies limit their job prospects. For instance, in 2018, white employees at the Sasol corporation protested against alleged exclusion from bonus schemes. Yet, economic data paints a different picture: white South Africans still enjoy higher average incomes and lower unemployment rates (around 7%) compared to black South Africans (over 40%). The Gini coefficient, a measure of inequality, remains among the world’s highest at 63.3%, reflecting persistent disparities that affirmative action seeks to address.

Social tensions also play a role. Many white South Africans report feeling culturally alienated in a nation where African languages and traditions dominate public life. Afrikaans, once a symbol of white authority, is less prominent in schools and government, prompting some to perceive this as erasure. Conversely, black South Africans argue that these shifts are necessary to reflect the country’s 80% black majority. Incidents of racism, such as black students reporting unfair treatment in schools, highlight that prejudice cuts both ways, complicating claims of one-sided oppression.

The "apartheid against whites" narrative has gained traction internationally, particularly in the United States, where former President Donald Trump in 2025 claimed white South Africans face "genocide." He offered asylum to white farmers, citing videos purportedly showing attacks. These claims were debunked, with South African authorities and independent analysts confirming no evidence of genocide. The videos, some dating back to the apartheid era, were misrepresented. Such international interventions often overlook South Africa’s complex reality, where poverty, not race, drives much of the crime and unrest. The country’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, established post-1994, aimed to heal racial divides, but its recommendations for economic justice remain only partially implemented, leaving both black and white communities frustrated.

South Africa’s challenges—high crime, unemployment, and inequality—stem from apartheid’s long shadow, not a new racial regime. White South Africans, while facing real anxieties about their place in a transforming society, retain significant economic advantages. Claims of apartheid against whites exaggerate isolated incidents and mischaracterise policies aimed at historical redress. The country’s path forward lies in addressing poverty and fostering dialogue, not in perpetuating narratives of racial victimhood.