Zürcher Nachrichten - China, Trump, and the power of war?

EUR -
AED 4.262927
AFN 72.54755
ALL 95.959794
AMD 436.717019
ANG 2.077873
AOA 1064.424836
ARS 1622.137154
AUD 1.662111
AWG 2.091995
AZN 2.004721
BAM 1.954956
BBD 2.333222
BDT 142.148604
BGN 1.984112
BHD 0.438264
BIF 3440.584323
BMD 1.160769
BND 1.482247
BOB 8.022569
BRL 6.082893
BSD 1.158415
BTN 108.54552
BWP 15.873076
BYN 3.429519
BYR 22751.0655
BZD 2.329924
CAD 1.600253
CDF 2643.647486
CHF 0.915997
CLF 0.026983
CLP 1065.422754
CNY 8.000826
CNH 8.008369
COP 4300.90321
CRC 539.750599
CUC 1.160769
CUP 30.760369
CVE 110.218819
CZK 24.429525
DJF 206.293565
DKK 7.472605
DOP 69.397934
DZD 153.768196
EGP 61.05376
ERN 17.41153
ETB 179.082352
FJD 2.600412
FKP 0.867356
GBP 0.865614
GEL 3.139818
GGP 0.867356
GHS 12.656588
GIP 0.867356
GMD 85.317477
GNF 10153.527079
GTQ 8.871283
GYD 242.442153
HKD 9.077971
HNL 30.674826
HRK 7.534082
HTG 151.893087
HUF 389.158713
IDR 19615.829382
ILS 3.619683
IMP 0.867356
INR 109.005347
IQD 1517.544552
IRR 1524118.253951
ISK 143.807703
JEP 0.867356
JMD 182.805532
JOD 0.822981
JPY 184.283367
KES 150.423575
KGS 101.507475
KHR 4648.952003
KMF 494.487173
KPW 1044.708436
KRW 1740.351532
KWD 0.355532
KYD 0.965383
KZT 559.238457
LAK 24941.227539
LBP 103744.091493
LKR 364.132726
LRD 212.58093
LSL 19.74907
LTL 3.427448
LVL 0.702138
LYD 7.385905
MAD 10.799496
MDL 20.261249
MGA 4836.806744
MKD 61.595926
MMK 2437.808692
MNT 4143.326649
MOP 9.335668
MRU 46.201652
MUR 53.929436
MVR 17.945125
MWK 2008.689157
MXN 20.558254
MYR 4.595472
MZN 74.184822
NAD 19.74907
NGN 1598.865618
NIO 42.63122
NOK 11.249717
NPR 173.665755
NZD 1.990939
OMR 0.446317
PAB 1.158405
PEN 4.006969
PGK 5.002796
PHP 69.723855
PKR 323.646095
PLN 4.269934
PYG 7558.832914
QAR 4.22443
RON 5.094378
RSD 117.432673
RUB 93.727216
RWF 1694.716928
SAR 4.354927
SBD 9.334872
SCR 15.983903
SDG 697.621937
SEK 10.794336
SGD 1.484176
SHP 0.870877
SLE 28.552994
SLL 24340.75073
SOS 661.994115
SRD 43.34301
STD 24025.56743
STN 24.489212
SVC 10.136622
SYP 128.785259
SZL 19.747386
THB 37.859641
TJS 11.115443
TMT 4.074298
TND 3.397876
TOP 2.794852
TRY 51.487403
TTD 7.870601
TWD 37.092332
TZS 2986.14584
UAH 50.87563
UGX 4338.070269
USD 1.160769
UYU 47.210219
UZS 14132.895807
VES 532.651381
VND 30586.253874
VUV 138.721223
WST 3.178418
XAF 655.65969
XAG 0.015829
XAU 0.000254
XCD 3.137035
XCG 2.087798
XDR 0.81543
XOF 655.682275
XPF 119.331742
YER 276.941074
ZAR 19.57688
ZMK 10448.311343
ZMW 21.923814
ZWL 373.767031
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • CMSC

    -0.0100

    22.87

    -0.04%

  • RYCEF

    -0.2800

    15.69

    -1.78%

  • VOD

    0.1800

    14.66

    +1.23%

  • BCC

    1.6900

    73.57

    +2.3%

  • BCE

    0.0700

    25.83

    +0.27%

  • RIO

    0.9300

    86.77

    +1.07%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    82.33

    +0.33%

  • GSK

    0.9600

    52.95

    +1.81%

  • RELX

    -1.3500

    32.46

    -4.16%

  • JRI

    0.1800

    11.86

    +1.52%

  • BP

    1.2200

    44.79

    +2.72%

  • AZN

    1.7100

    185.78

    +0.92%

  • CMSD

    -0.1100

    22.63

    -0.49%

  • BTI

    -0.1600

    57.76

    -0.28%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.