Zürcher Nachrichten - Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China

EUR -
AED 4.238558
AFN 75.593749
ALL 93.113255
AMD 422.431466
AOA 1058.341674
ARS 1729.258934
AUD 1.635261
AWG 2.077442
AZN 1.960944
BAM 1.95502
BBD 2.326482
BDT 142.723059
BHD 0.435639
BIF 3450.2982
BMD 1.154135
BND 1.478142
BOB 13.745516
BRL 5.895378
BSD 1.155044
BTN 110.019293
BWP 15.561196
BYN 3.434045
BYR 22621.037064
BZD 2.323083
CAD 1.60779
CDF 2620.48721
CHF 0.935368
CLF 0.026837
CLP 1056.228802
CNY 7.787642
CNH 7.786081
COP 3619.158186
CRC 524.406685
CUC 1.154135
CUP 30.584565
CVE 110.221026
CZK 24.259987
DJF 205.687938
DKK 7.475976
DOP 67.345174
DZD 153.233553
EGP 57.651216
ERN 17.312018
ETB 186.779646
FJD 2.552364
FKP 0.856081
GBP 0.854065
GEL 3.012086
GGP 0.856081
GHS 13.56059
GIP 0.856081
GMD 84.831731
GNF 10144.084735
GTQ 8.813331
GYD 241.90349
HKD 9.055657
HNL 30.962586
HRK 7.534647
HTG 151.033015
HUF 364.832898
IDR 20584.739782
ILS 3.46466
IMP 0.856081
INR 110.111247
IQD 1513.196292
IRR 1586617.611509
ISK 142.201148
JEP 0.856081
JMD 183.442376
JOD 0.818297
JPY 183.742839
KES 149.347743
KGS 100.928614
KHR 4683.233012
KMF 491.661295
KRW 1633.094652
KWD 0.356558
KYD 0.962616
KZT 538.515153
LAK 26086.592439
LBP 103437.580447
LKR 387.125552
LRD 208.479599
LSL 18.689744
LTL 3.407859
LVL 0.698124
LYD 7.361063
MAD 10.771403
MDL 20.075078
MGA 4947.154867
MKD 61.500464
MMK 2423.16271
MNT 4148.252132
MOP 9.334276
MRU 46.330921
MUR 54.291029
MVR 17.831333
MWK 2002.952962
MXN 19.781514
MYR 4.72145
MZN 73.754932
NAD 18.689744
NGN 1571.031266
NIO 42.503963
NOK 10.95441
NPR 176.042104
NZD 1.960165
OMR 0.443766
PAB 1.155039
PEN 3.901643
PGK 5.107051
PHP 70.536666
PKR 320.67955
PLN 4.30386
PYG 6875.286807
QAR 4.21072
RON 5.241504
RSD 117.4043
RUB 95.215737
RWF 1696.87447
SAR 4.32253
SBD 9.308899
SCR 15.972987
SDG 693.021093
SEK 10.955547
SGD 1.477621
SLE 28.392379
SOS 660.156642
SRD 43.569153
STD 23888.254875
STN 24.490654
SVC 10.106968
SZL 18.686626
THB 38.202429
TJS 10.666775
TMT 4.051012
TND 3.385949
TRY 55.095386
TTD 7.834874
TWD 37.21611
TZS 3052.68358
UAH 51.815175
UGX 4302.283552
USD 1.154135
UYU 46.531234
UZS 13782.501305
VES 872.251493
VND 30165.614579
VUV 137.764899
WST 3.155077
XAF 655.71244
XAG 0.017765
XAU 0.000263
XCD 3.119107
XCG 2.081769
XDR 0.815496
XOF 655.698242
XPF 119.331742
YER 275.140339
ZAR 18.698999
ZMK 10388.601949
ZMW 21.605474
ZWL 371.630852
  • RBGPF

    -0.6200

    69.88

    -0.89%

  • RYCEF

    -0.2800

    20.57

    -1.36%

  • NGG

    -1.4000

    79.48

    -1.76%

  • GSK

    -0.8000

    52.16

    -1.53%

  • VOD

    -0.4400

    15.75

    -2.79%

  • RIO

    0.8100

    101.91

    +0.79%

  • RELX

    0.1000

    35.62

    +0.28%

  • CMSC

    -0.1738

    21.57

    -0.81%

  • BTI

    -2.2800

    57.05

    -4%

  • BP

    1.2500

    42.88

    +2.92%

  • CMSD

    -0.1300

    21.69

    -0.6%

  • BCE

    -0.2100

    22.54

    -0.93%

  • BCC

    -1.8500

    84.75

    -2.18%

  • JRI

    -0.0800

    12.73

    -0.63%

  • AZN

    0.4900

    161.91

    +0.3%

Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China
Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China / Photo: Anna Moneymaker - GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP

Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China

Chomping peacefully on a fruitsicle cake in her grassy Washington zoo enclosure Mei Xiang is blissfully unaware that she and a handful of other cute pandas are at the center of a ferocious misinformation campaign driving anti-US sentiment in China.

Text size:

Evidence-free claims that pandas have been abused at US zoos have ricocheted across Chinese social media in recent months, fanning anti-American perceptions amid already fraught ties between Washington and Beijing.

The falsehoods, which researchers say were amplified by clout-chasing influencers, have cast a shadow on Beijing's "panda diplomacy," the decades-old practice of gifting or loaning the bears to other countries as a token of friendship.

In multiple posts on Chinese platforms including Weibo and Douyin, a video fuelled the narrative that Mei Xiang was abused by the Smithsonian's National Zoo in Washington DC and made to undergo a painful artificial insemination procedure dozens of times.

The posts triggered impassioned pleas for the panda to be rescued and returned to China, with the hashtag "Save Mei Xiang" viewed on Weibo hundreds of millions of times.

But according to AFP factcheckers, the video actually shows a different male panda in Singapore undergoing a health check-up in 2015, a story widely reported by local media at the time.

In other posts on the same platforms, an image purported to show Mei Xiang's mate, Tian Tian, sedated and restrained during an examination.

But the photo actually depicts a panda in China's Fujian province undergoing an examination in 2005, according to the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab).

- 'Rooted in nationalism' -

"Amid increased competition between the US and China, the deterioration of US-China relations is now echoed in Chinese narratives" alleging the mistreatment of pandas, the DFRLab said in a report last month.

"The narratives are deeply rooted in Chinese nationalism and mistrust of the West and have been amplified across Chinese media and social media."

Last week, AFP journalists in Washington saw Mei Xiang and Tian Tian, seemingly healthy and devouring frozen treats in their enclosures as the zoo hosted a nine-day "Panda Palooza" celebration with panda-themed refreshments, film screenings and music concerts.

The zoo, which declined to comment on the online misinformation, held the party to bid farewell to the bears and their three-year-old cub Xiao Qi Ji, who will be returning to China in December as its contract with the Chinese government expires.

Another panda named Ya Ya was returned to China by the Memphis zoo in April after its loan agreement ended. This followed uproar from Chinese activists and social media users who accused the zoo of abusing her.

Many also blamed the zoo for the death of Ya Ya's mate, Le Le, with accusations swirling online -- despite no evidence -- that zookeepers had stabbed the bear and sold his eyeball.

The zoo vigorously rejected what it said was "misinformation." The Chinese Association of Zoological Gardens also backed the zookeepers, saying in a joint statement that the bears at the Memphis zoo had received "excellent care."

But that did little to quell the nationalist outrage.

- 'Fan those flames' -

China's state-linked Global Times, the mouthpiece of the ruling Communist Party, linked the controversy over Ya Ya to US-China geopolitical tensions.

"If this had not happened during a period when Washington is intensifying its containment and suppression of China, this matter would not have caused such a stir," it said in an editorial in March.

Amid tense relations between the two biggest economies over issues such as Taiwan, US observers say the Chinese government appears keen to condone and encourage anti-American sentiment.

"Misinformation around panda treatment is an example of a convenient way to fan those flames," Isaac Stone Fish, chief executive of China-focused data company Strategy Risks, told AFP.

The misinformation not only bred mistrust about the United States in China but also sparked fervent calls to suspend the panda exchange, potentially closing what DFRLab called one of the few avenues of cooperation between the two countries.

Aside from Washington and Memphis, the zoos in San Diego and Atlanta have either returned or are set to return their pandas to China by next year. Without China's extension of the loan agreement, US zoos face the prospect of having no pandas for the first time in 50 years.

"This (misinformation) campaign is particularly sad given the ways in which 'panda diplomacy' previously played such a crucial role in helping to foster positive relations between China and the West," Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University, told AFP.

It is, he added, "an unfortunate sign of the current state of relations between powers."

burs-ac/sms

Ch.Siegenthaler--NZN