Zürcher Nachrichten - Roe v. Wade: 1973 case that enshrined US abortion rights

EUR -
AED 3.966593
AFN 76.489498
ALL 98.722625
AMD 423.682516
ANG 1.951759
AOA 986.51024
ARS 1153.965136
AUD 1.717671
AWG 1.943866
AZN 1.829151
BAM 1.955258
BBD 2.186573
BDT 131.583513
BGN 1.955119
BHD 0.407038
BIF 3209.83966
BMD 1.079926
BND 1.448412
BOB 7.49992
BRL 6.221558
BSD 1.083
BTN 92.659306
BWP 14.744911
BYN 3.544084
BYR 21166.540686
BZD 2.175377
CAD 1.546513
CDF 3104.785894
CHF 0.953812
CLF 0.026129
CLP 1002.688734
CNY 7.833245
CNH 7.848461
COP 4477.004136
CRC 541.639777
CUC 1.079926
CUP 28.618027
CVE 110.234433
CZK 24.926864
DJF 192.84474
DKK 7.460245
DOP 68.329787
DZD 144.247101
EGP 54.647787
ERN 16.198883
ETB 142.909849
FJD 2.483235
FKP 0.83508
GBP 0.83617
GEL 3.002601
GGP 0.83508
GHS 16.786345
GIP 0.83508
GMD 76.131828
GNF 9365.489747
GTQ 8.346686
GYD 226.567175
HKD 8.395849
HNL 27.705061
HRK 7.536046
HTG 141.911963
HUF 399.035192
IDR 17968.827151
ILS 3.970816
IMP 0.83508
INR 92.427858
IQD 1418.706604
IRR 45464.865774
ISK 144.104989
JEP 0.83508
JMD 170.032851
JOD 0.765771
JPY 162.793916
KES 140.077394
KGS 93.618966
KHR 4342.83598
KMF 492.446303
KPW 971.933137
KRW 1586.815605
KWD 0.332939
KYD 0.902441
KZT 544.853871
LAK 23454.27913
LBP 97037.593687
LKR 321.33792
LRD 216.589941
LSL 19.614279
LTL 3.18874
LVL 0.653236
LYD 5.226502
MAD 10.38692
MDL 19.520406
MGA 5066.595073
MKD 61.512943
MMK 2267.557501
MNT 3760.002454
MOP 8.670096
MRU 42.98808
MUR 49.247028
MVR 16.641121
MWK 1877.879279
MXN 21.647324
MYR 4.794888
MZN 69.018261
NAD 19.614279
NGN 1643.646799
NIO 39.849688
NOK 11.36373
NPR 148.252145
NZD 1.887073
OMR 0.415679
PAB 1.083
PEN 3.936308
PGK 4.458846
PHP 61.944662
PKR 303.554327
PLN 4.176472
PYG 8630.526906
QAR 3.947705
RON 4.975977
RSD 117.203204
RUB 90.572862
RWF 1530.8755
SAR 4.05097
SBD 9.087463
SCR 15.518241
SDG 648.526709
SEK 10.903274
SGD 1.446339
SHP 0.848652
SLE 24.676191
SLL 22645.499889
SOS 618.928376
SRD 39.488555
STD 22352.278425
SVC 9.476285
SYP 14041.047555
SZL 19.620559
THB 36.736874
TJS 11.804327
TMT 3.790539
TND 3.355669
TOP 2.529298
TRY 41.036069
TTD 7.365889
TWD 35.682906
TZS 2856.403477
UAH 45.127586
UGX 3968.899456
USD 1.079926
UYU 45.697328
UZS 14021.112057
VES 73.67926
VND 27694.690607
VUV 132.45525
WST 3.034363
XAF 655.775159
XAG 0.032635
XAU 0.000359
XCD 2.918553
XDR 0.815574
XOF 655.775159
XPF 119.331742
YER 265.771964
ZAR 19.71431
ZMK 9720.626033
ZMW 31.227052
ZWL 347.735585
  • RBGPF

    67.0200

    67.02

    +100%

  • VOD

    -0.4400

    9.29

    -4.74%

  • BTI

    0.0100

    40.84

    +0.02%

  • AZN

    -0.8400

    74.09

    -1.13%

  • GSK

    -0.6700

    38.57

    -1.74%

  • NGG

    -1.0100

    62.84

    -1.61%

  • RYCEF

    0.0500

    10.18

    +0.49%

  • CMSC

    0.0100

    23.17

    +0.04%

  • RELX

    -0.2000

    49.81

    -0.4%

  • RIO

    0.1800

    62.17

    +0.29%

  • JRI

    0.0600

    13.05

    +0.46%

  • BCC

    3.8200

    103.28

    +3.7%

  • SCS

    0.2700

    10.84

    +2.49%

  • BCE

    -0.1800

    22.52

    -0.8%

  • CMSD

    -0.0830

    23.077

    -0.36%

  • BP

    -0.4400

    34.11

    -1.29%

Roe v. Wade: 1973 case that enshrined US abortion rights
Roe v. Wade: 1973 case that enshrined US abortion rights / Photo: Stefani Reynolds - AFP

Roe v. Wade: 1973 case that enshrined US abortion rights

A US Supreme Court draft opinion leaked to the press on Monday suggests a majority of justices are ready to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade, shredding nearly 50 years of constitutional protections on abortion rights.

Text size:

Here is how the original 1973 court case played out.

- Right to privacy -

On January 22, 1973, the court decided that the constitutional right to privacy applied to abortion.

Roe was "Jane Roe," a pseudonym for Norma McCorvey, a single mother pregnant for the third time, who wanted an abortion.

She sued the Dallas attorney general, Henry Wade, over a Texas law that made it a crime to terminate a pregnancy except in cases of rape or incest, or when the mother's life was in danger.

Filing a complaint alongside her was Texas doctor James Hallford, who argued the law's medical provision was vague, and that he was unable to reliably determine which of his patients fell into the allowed category.

The "Does," another couple, childless, also filed a companion complaint, saying that medical risks made it unsafe but not life-threatening for the wife to carry a pregnancy to term, and arguing they should be able to obtain a safe, legal abortion should she become pregnant.

The trifecta of complaints -- from a woman who wanted an abortion, a doctor who wanted to perform them and a non-pregnant woman who wanted the right if the need arose -- ultimately reached the nation's top court.

The court heard arguments twice, and then waited until after Republican president Richard Nixon's re-election, in November 1972.

- 'Sensitive and emotional' controversy -

Only the following January did it offer its historic seven-to-two decision -- overturning the Texas laws and setting a legal precedent that has had ramifications in all 50 states.

Justice Harry Blackmun, writing for the majority, said the court recognized the "sensitive and emotional nature of the abortion controversy, of the vigorous opposing views, even among physicians, and of the deep and seemingly absolute convictions that the subject inspires."

But he argued that the "right of privacy... is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy."

"A state criminal abortion statute of the current Texas type, that excepts from criminality only a lifesaving procedure on behalf of the mother, without regard to pregnancy stage and without recognition of the other interests involved, is violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment," the ruling read.

But the top court agreed with lower court rulings that the right to privacy with regard to pregnancy "is not absolute, and is subject to some limitations."

"At some point, the state interests as to protection of health, medical standards and prenatal life become dominant," Blackmun wrote.

The top court thus ruled partially against the doctor and the Does, but in favor of Jane Roe, who has since become a pro-life activist.

On the same day, the justices ruled in the separate "Doe v. Bolton" case, which authorized each state to add restrictions to abortion rights for later-term pregnancies.

The constitutional right to abortion was later confirmed in a number of decisions, including "Webster v. Reproductive Health Services" in 1989, "Planned Parenthood v. Casey" in 1992 and Stenberg v. Carhart" in 2000.

E.Schneyder--NZN