Zürcher Nachrichten - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

EUR -
AED 4.241003
AFN 73.32143
ALL 96.264457
AMD 435.49084
ANG 2.066822
AOA 1058.764604
ARS 1597.949484
AUD 1.676973
AWG 2.078272
AZN 1.967396
BAM 1.962489
BBD 2.325728
BDT 141.683564
BGN 1.973561
BHD 0.435685
BIF 3427.417086
BMD 1.154596
BND 1.486969
BOB 8.008298
BRL 6.067751
BSD 1.154731
BTN 109.448969
BWP 15.919471
BYN 3.437216
BYR 22630.074075
BZD 2.322286
CAD 1.604831
CDF 2635.36902
CHF 0.921971
CLF 0.027055
CLP 1068.301597
CNY 7.980392
CNH 7.989998
COP 4249.2467
CRC 536.225485
CUC 1.154596
CUP 30.596784
CVE 110.98555
CZK 24.603629
DJF 205.195187
DKK 7.496448
DOP 68.95827
DZD 153.879614
EGP 60.780401
ERN 17.318934
ETB 180.838585
FJD 2.609838
FKP 0.868614
GBP 0.870276
GEL 3.094767
GGP 0.868614
GHS 12.666364
GIP 0.868614
GMD 84.867224
GNF 10137.349919
GTQ 8.837161
GYD 241.720221
HKD 9.035924
HNL 30.608778
HRK 7.557064
HTG 151.366612
HUF 390.276858
IDR 19617.503194
ILS 3.622683
IMP 0.868614
INR 109.529794
IQD 1512.520257
IRR 1516272.693223
ISK 144.047794
JEP 0.868614
JMD 181.759555
JOD 0.818654
JPY 185.080568
KES 149.986359
KGS 100.96983
KHR 4632.238016
KMF 494.167328
KPW 1039.005581
KRW 1741.130593
KWD 0.355512
KYD 0.962293
KZT 558.235579
LAK 25285.644395
LBP 103394.037822
LKR 363.741444
LRD 212.012665
LSL 19.813301
LTL 3.409221
LVL 0.698404
LYD 7.360592
MAD 10.789123
MDL 20.282399
MGA 4820.437097
MKD 61.637435
MMK 2427.526343
MNT 4123.646826
MOP 9.31702
MRU 46.322813
MUR 54.000874
MVR 17.838939
MWK 2005.532983
MXN 20.922547
MYR 4.530678
MZN 73.836825
NAD 19.813296
NGN 1597.337286
NIO 42.397186
NOK 11.20288
NPR 175.114145
NZD 2.009741
OMR 0.444613
PAB 1.154721
PEN 3.994328
PGK 4.975197
PHP 69.911197
PKR 322.367369
PLN 4.298271
PYG 7549.734427
QAR 4.218027
RON 5.111746
RSD 117.558661
RUB 94.006614
RWF 1686.864195
SAR 4.332448
SBD 9.285301
SCR 16.659944
SDG 693.912357
SEK 10.938258
SGD 1.492666
SHP 0.866246
SLE 28.345751
SLL 24211.30527
SOS 659.855623
SRD 43.413994
STD 23897.798134
STN 24.650616
SVC 10.103439
SYP 129.111885
SZL 19.813287
THB 37.940438
TJS 11.033396
TMT 4.041085
TND 3.37839
TOP 2.779989
TRY 51.302613
TTD 7.845709
TWD 36.998328
TZS 2974.800639
UAH 50.614226
UGX 4301.662877
USD 1.154596
UYU 46.739318
UZS 14091.83988
VES 540.268027
VND 30409.162038
VUV 138.27014
WST 3.204592
XAF 658.200578
XAG 0.0165
XAU 0.000256
XCD 3.120353
XCG 2.081103
XDR 0.816058
XOF 655.810693
XPF 119.331742
YER 275.490657
ZAR 19.766671
ZMK 10392.750198
ZMW 21.737094
ZWL 371.779317
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • RELX

    -0.1000

    31.97

    -0.31%

  • BCC

    0.1400

    74.43

    +0.19%

  • RIO

    0.8500

    86.64

    +0.98%

  • JRI

    -0.2700

    11.8

    -2.29%

  • CMSD

    -0.0900

    22.66

    -0.4%

  • AZN

    5.0200

    188.42

    +2.66%

  • NGG

    -0.4800

    81.92

    -0.59%

  • GSK

    -0.1000

    53.84

    -0.19%

  • BCE

    -0.2200

    25.25

    -0.87%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    22.77

    -0.22%

  • VOD

    -0.1400

    14.49

    -0.97%

  • RYCEF

    -0.5900

    14.65

    -4.03%

  • BTI

    0.3749

    57.8

    +0.65%

  • BP

    0.5100

    46.68

    +1.09%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: Damien MEYER - AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

T.Furrer--NZN