Zürcher Nachrichten - 'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals

EUR -
AED 4.248105
AFN 75.770596
ALL 92.762559
AMD 422.720519
ANG 2.0703
AOA 1061.880869
ARS 1706.354669
AUD 1.637736
AWG 2.083564
AZN 1.971037
BAM 1.955432
BBD 2.326962
BDT 141.823334
BGN 1.962242
BHD 0.435718
BIF 3453.950583
BMD 1.156733
BND 1.477822
BOB 13.465468
BRL 6.040925
BSD 1.155383
BTN 110.192281
BWP 15.565073
BYN 3.514139
BYR 22671.957183
BZD 2.323663
CAD 1.60514
CDF 2629.253412
CHF 0.941015
CLF 0.026895
CLP 1056.7913
CNY 7.800083
CNH 7.801606
COP 3603.822404
CRC 519.802266
CUC 1.156733
CUP 30.653411
CVE 110.244272
CZK 24.210763
DJF 205.741316
DKK 7.473191
DOP 67.627285
DZD 152.299364
EGP 57.668157
ERN 17.350988
ETB 186.897659
FJD 2.584377
FKP 0.853399
GBP 0.855002
GEL 3.019524
GGP 0.853399
GHS 12.651621
GIP 0.853399
GMD 85.024294
GNF 10149.091752
GTQ 8.815343
GYD 241.67456
HKD 9.077054
HNL 30.972177
HRK 7.532994
HTG 151.121586
HUF 363.017812
IDR 20622.34285
ILS 3.418265
IMP 0.853399
INR 110.410701
IQD 1513.515426
IRR 1590030.052589
ISK 142.166837
JEP 0.853399
JMD 182.965599
JOD 0.820169
JPY 184.272161
KES 149.331922
KGS 101.156702
KHR 4675.120976
KMF 493.925187
KPW 1041.059598
KRW 1638.477341
KWD 0.357061
KYD 0.962819
KZT 536.1092
LAK 26076.097131
LBP 103462.246866
LKR 384.457714
LRD 209.700572
LSL 18.691186
LTL 3.415531
LVL 0.699696
LYD 7.356617
MAD 10.715985
MDL 20.034233
MGA 4974.064769
MKD 61.518433
MMK 2428.743274
MNT 4161.410395
MOP 9.338444
MRU 46.399276
MUR 54.486429
MVR 17.871955
MWK 2003.423313
MXN 19.69164
MYR 4.726298
MZN 73.927211
NAD 18.691186
NGN 1572.659254
NIO 42.522005
NOK 10.922567
NPR 176.30785
NZD 1.963226
OMR 0.444768
PAB 1.155383
PEN 3.896867
PGK 5.190024
PHP 71.098608
PKR 320.900664
PLN 4.306226
PYG 6934.696128
QAR 4.211808
RON 5.236186
RSD 117.317942
RUB 97.377191
RWF 1698.980555
SAR 4.340955
SBD 9.310058
SCR 15.912008
SDG 694.622124
SEK 11.020235
SGD 1.480159
SHP 0.856984
SLE 28.344188
SLL 24256.10146
SOS 660.275854
SRD 43.926343
STD 23942.02751
STN 24.495394
SVC 10.109099
SYP 15039.835978
SZL 18.688486
THB 38.337629
TJS 10.669694
TMT 4.060131
TND 3.387463
TOP 2.785134
TRY 55.369898
TTD 7.827528
TWD 37.04043
TZS 3061.72433
UAH 51.684982
UGX 4292.192975
USD 1.156733
UYU 46.291296
UZS 13754.413873
VES 890.810236
VND 30246.82002
VUV 137.249116
WST 3.163007
XAF 655.833689
XAG 0.017878
XAU 0.000264
XCD 3.126128
XCG 2.082208
XDR 0.81787
XOF 655.833689
XPF 119.331742
YER 274.381102
ZAR 18.703474
ZMK 10411.984809
ZMW 21.835894
ZWL 372.467396
  • CMSC

    -0.0250

    21.45

    -0.12%

  • JRI

    0.0635

    12.61

    +0.5%

  • BCC

    -0.8900

    83.24

    -1.07%

  • CMSD

    -0.0100

    21.58

    -0.05%

  • RELX

    -0.2400

    34.43

    -0.7%

  • RIO

    -0.4100

    95.68

    -0.43%

  • BCE

    0.1500

    23.47

    +0.64%

  • NGG

    -0.1500

    81.05

    -0.19%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    71.34

    0%

  • RYCEF

    0.1300

    20.84

    +0.62%

  • GSK

    -0.4785

    49.52

    -0.97%

  • BTI

    -0.2900

    57.06

    -0.51%

  • VOD

    0.2000

    16.42

    +1.22%

  • BP

    0.2196

    42.53

    +0.52%

  • AZN

    -0.7900

    156.45

    -0.5%

'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals
'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals / Photo: Alex Ogle - AFP/File

'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals

The black-and-white image appears to show the unlikeliest of interactions: an orangutan cradling endangered leopard cubs deep in the jungles of Malaysia's Sabah state.

Text size:

But the viral image is not just unlikely, it is fake, part of a trend of wildlife images generated by artificial intelligence that experts warn endanger animals and people.

AFP fact-checkers have debunked scores of similar synthetic visuals, from an elephant climbing a tree to escape flooding in Myanmar to a pink dolphin leaping out of water in the Philippines.

The images are often accompanied by heartwarming anecdotes and have circulated widely in multiple languages on platforms such as Facebook, TikTok and X.

They may seem more like feel-good fiction than dangerous misinformation, but experts warn hyper-realistic visuals of wild animals behaving like pets, or even like humans, can distort public perceptions of wildlife and harm conservation efforts.

"This misunderstanding can lead people to approach animals too closely or interact with them in unsafe ways," Jose Guerrero-Casado, a zoology professor at Spain's University of Cordoba, told AFP.

He cited a widely reported incident in China's northwest Xinjiang region in January, where a woman was attacked by a rare snow leopard after trying to get closer for a photo.

China's forestry department said it stepped up patrols after the incident and warned the public to maintain a safe distance when encountering wild animals.

- Sowing doubt -

Conservationists say AI visuals portraying wild animals as cute or cuddly make it harder for social media users to discern what is real and can fuel exploitation.

They increase demand for certain species "to be used in the tourism industry as photo props, exploited to make social media content or to be kept as pets", said Chris Lewis, a researcher at the international wildlife charity Born Free.

And while the visuals could encourage some people to support animal protection, "the negative impacts outweigh that completely," said Jenny Roberts of conservation group WWF.

"People could get hurt," she told AFP.

WWF uses real images for its fundraising efforts, but fake content online "desensitises" people to even the most incredible original visuals, she said.

"When you do have something remarkable, people question it," Roberts said, recounting an incident where a camera trap set up by her charity captured a tiger with five cubs in China.

Such footage had never been filmed before in the East Asian country, she said.

"But when we put the content out there, we were questioned on social media: 'Is this AI-generated?'"

- 'Major threat' -

A September study in the journal Conservation Biology, co-authored by Guerrero-Casado, concluded that the rapid spread of AI misinformation and its potential to harm environmental efforts is a "major threat" to society.

The researchers highlighted another challenge for those working in conservation: AI images "could affect the ability of people to identify species" and cause misunderstandings about the abundance and distribution of wildlife.

Scientists often mine data from citizen science platforms that accept photos and recordings of wildlife submitted by users.

But AI generation and manipulation could lead to flawed research, several experts warned in a recent commentary in the journal Nature.

They called for more robust authentication of submissions, and education of users about the risks of manipulating images and recordings.

Meta, Facebook's parent company, and TikTok require users to label realistic visuals that have been generated or significantly altered using AI. They also say their platforms have tools that automatically label content as AI-generated.

However, AFP fact-checkers spotted multiple wildlife posts without clear labels -- even when users had already said in their captions that they were fake.

Meta and TikTok pay AFP to fact-check posts with potentially false information.

"Conservation depends on a well-informed society that understands the ecological and conservation needs of wild species," Guerrero-Casado said.

"AI-generated fake content does not contribute to this goal."

A.Ferraro--NZN