Zürcher Nachrichten - 'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals

EUR -
AED 4.117521
AFN 73.997387
ALL 91.743999
AMD 406.150384
ANG 2.007315
AOA 1028.118927
ARS 1709.714514
AUD 1.610516
AWG 2.020921
AZN 1.895532
BAM 1.950254
BBD 2.256493
BDT 137.738286
BGN 1.887434
BHD 0.422318
BIF 3379.918005
BMD 1.121176
BND 1.433835
BOB 13.461018
BRL 5.85658
BSD 1.120369
BTN 108.537782
BWP 15.48878
BYN 3.374569
BYR 21975.059181
BZD 2.253203
CAD 1.597043
CDF 2589.917854
CHF 0.929691
CLF 0.027916
CLP 1102.27346
CNY 7.516984
CNH 7.520263
COP 3709.849672
CRC 513.362942
CUC 1.121176
CUP 26.887255
CVE 109.955241
CZK 24.44322
DJF 199.502422
DKK 7.473652
DOP 66.892747
DZD 150.471939
EGP 58.805151
ERN 16.817647
ETB 182.990355
FJD 2.523546
FKP 0.847192
GBP 0.847458
GEL 2.920668
GGP 0.847192
GHS 13.157932
GIP 0.847192
GMD 82.408703
GNF 9855.41173
GTQ 8.561766
GYD 234.349804
HKD 8.797945
HNL 30.0788
HRK 7.534871
HTG 146.709969
HUF 367.812871
IDR 20088.119151
ILS 3.428614
IMP 0.847192
INR 107.965652
IQD 1467.665381
IRR 1958179.022779
ISK 137.209759
JEP 0.847192
JMD 177.365872
JOD 0.794901
JPY 176.985529
KES 145.48384
KGS 98.04644
KHR 4544.299401
KMF 491.07538
KPW 1009.059196
KRW 1506.261361
KWD 0.346679
KYD 0.93357
KZT 503.361959
LAK 25165.106372
LBP 100326.802437
LKR 370.49626
LRD 191.567764
LSL 18.732129
LTL 3.310543
LVL 0.678189
LYD 7.174947
MAD 11.130643
MDL 20.021044
MGA 4950.187085
MKD 61.723172
MMK 2353.861498
MNT 4031.842718
MOP 9.05539
MRU 44.769676
MUR 53.872649
MVR 17.33266
MWK 1942.679182
MXN 20.368296
MYR 4.582807
MZN 71.642022
NAD 18.732129
NGN 1488.418415
NIO 41.2246
NOK 10.764886
NPR 173.665857
NZD 2.002872
OMR 0.431089
PAB 1.120339
PEN 3.882363
PGK 5.073797
PHP 70.220419
PKR 310.30862
PLN 4.385375
PYG 6554.680703
QAR 4.083641
RON 5.330744
RSD 117.473524
RUB 94.93476
RWF 1659.277381
SAR 4.20023
SBD 9.056944
SCR 15.427121
SDG 674.386768
SEK 11.256433
SGD 1.435028
SHP 0.846522
SLE 27.595658
SLL 23510.50128
SOS 640.316129
SRD 42.393362
STD 23206.089673
STN 24.431609
SVC 9.802385
SYP 14577.536993
SZL 18.72874
THB 37.751147
TJS 10.312411
TMT 3.924118
TND 3.338351
TOP 2.699524
TRY 55.107171
TTD 7.596599
TWD 35.606888
TZS 2956.726255
UAH 50.411433
UGX 4470.40624
USD 1.121176
UYU 45.151995
UZS 13213.774946
VES 970.353753
VND 29151.149298
VUV 133.935934
WST 3.126525
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.01815
XAU 0.000268994988
XCD 3.030036
XCG 2.019112
XDR 0.79273
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 264.942349
ZAR 18.688414
ZMK 10091.938184
ZMW 22.014473
ZWL 361.018372
SSP 6404.823311
MXV 2.303122
  • RBGPF

    0.0900

    65.09

    +0.14%

  • RYCEF

    0.1200

    19.42

    +0.62%

  • GSK

    -0.1500

    47.03

    -0.32%

  • RIO

    1.3400

    94.21

    +1.42%

  • VOD

    0.4400

    16.82

    +2.62%

  • NGG

    0.7900

    76.12

    +1.04%

  • CMSC

    0.0800

    20.24

    +0.4%

  • AZN

    -0.8000

    156.9

    -0.51%

  • RELX

    -0.0700

    33.42

    -0.21%

  • BTI

    0.2849

    52.64

    +0.54%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.43

    +0.44%

  • BP

    0.2900

    44.79

    +0.65%

  • BCC

    0.2900

    74.99

    +0.39%

  • BCE

    -0.1900

    19.73

    -0.96%

  • JRI

    0.1300

    10.9

    +1.19%

'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals
'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals / Photo: Alex Ogle - AFP/File

'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals

The black-and-white image appears to show the unlikeliest of interactions: an orangutan cradling endangered leopard cubs deep in the jungles of Malaysia's Sabah state.

Text size:

But the viral image is not just unlikely, it is fake, part of a trend of wildlife images generated by artificial intelligence that experts warn endanger animals and people.

AFP fact-checkers have debunked scores of similar synthetic visuals, from an elephant climbing a tree to escape flooding in Myanmar to a pink dolphin leaping out of water in the Philippines.

The images are often accompanied by heartwarming anecdotes and have circulated widely in multiple languages on platforms such as Facebook, TikTok and X.

They may seem more like feel-good fiction than dangerous misinformation, but experts warn hyper-realistic visuals of wild animals behaving like pets, or even like humans, can distort public perceptions of wildlife and harm conservation efforts.

"This misunderstanding can lead people to approach animals too closely or interact with them in unsafe ways," Jose Guerrero-Casado, a zoology professor at Spain's University of Cordoba, told AFP.

He cited a widely reported incident in China's northwest Xinjiang region in January, where a woman was attacked by a rare snow leopard after trying to get closer for a photo.

China's forestry department said it stepped up patrols after the incident and warned the public to maintain a safe distance when encountering wild animals.

- Sowing doubt -

Conservationists say AI visuals portraying wild animals as cute or cuddly make it harder for social media users to discern what is real and can fuel exploitation.

They increase demand for certain species "to be used in the tourism industry as photo props, exploited to make social media content or to be kept as pets", said Chris Lewis, a researcher at the international wildlife charity Born Free.

And while the visuals could encourage some people to support animal protection, "the negative impacts outweigh that completely," said Jenny Roberts of conservation group WWF.

"People could get hurt," she told AFP.

WWF uses real images for its fundraising efforts, but fake content online "desensitises" people to even the most incredible original visuals, she said.

"When you do have something remarkable, people question it," Roberts said, recounting an incident where a camera trap set up by her charity captured a tiger with five cubs in China.

Such footage had never been filmed before in the East Asian country, she said.

"But when we put the content out there, we were questioned on social media: 'Is this AI-generated?'"

- 'Major threat' -

A September study in the journal Conservation Biology, co-authored by Guerrero-Casado, concluded that the rapid spread of AI misinformation and its potential to harm environmental efforts is a "major threat" to society.

The researchers highlighted another challenge for those working in conservation: AI images "could affect the ability of people to identify species" and cause misunderstandings about the abundance and distribution of wildlife.

Scientists often mine data from citizen science platforms that accept photos and recordings of wildlife submitted by users.

But AI generation and manipulation could lead to flawed research, several experts warned in a recent commentary in the journal Nature.

They called for more robust authentication of submissions, and education of users about the risks of manipulating images and recordings.

Meta, Facebook's parent company, and TikTok require users to label realistic visuals that have been generated or significantly altered using AI. They also say their platforms have tools that automatically label content as AI-generated.

However, AFP fact-checkers spotted multiple wildlife posts without clear labels -- even when users had already said in their captions that they were fake.

Meta and TikTok pay AFP to fact-check posts with potentially false information.

"Conservation depends on a well-informed society that understands the ecological and conservation needs of wild species," Guerrero-Casado said.

"AI-generated fake content does not contribute to this goal."

A.Ferraro--NZN