Zürcher Nachrichten - US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning

EUR -
AED 4.30511
AFN 81.83978
ALL 97.811889
AMD 449.87212
ANG 2.097616
AOA 1074.815474
ARS 1479.145696
AUD 1.792474
AWG 2.109779
AZN 1.990983
BAM 1.953408
BBD 2.365104
BDT 142.908653
BGN 1.954031
BHD 0.441768
BIF 3489.956005
BMD 1.1721
BND 1.497579
BOB 8.094088
BRL 6.410097
BSD 1.171465
BTN 100.328139
BWP 15.639449
BYN 3.833438
BYR 22973.153276
BZD 2.352939
CAD 1.600684
CDF 3381.507455
CHF 0.935095
CLF 0.028788
CLP 1104.727546
CNY 8.409695
CNH 8.413536
COP 4726.023027
CRC 592.179874
CUC 1.1721
CUP 31.060641
CVE 110.132951
CZK 24.647322
DJF 208.605222
DKK 7.460778
DOP 70.283931
DZD 151.892564
EGP 58.229775
ERN 17.581495
ETB 162.568907
FJD 2.631008
FKP 0.859549
GBP 0.863366
GEL 3.176962
GGP 0.859549
GHS 12.211046
GIP 0.859549
GMD 83.802376
GNF 10159.818416
GTQ 9.003205
GYD 245.08242
HKD 9.200947
HNL 30.63049
HRK 7.53193
HTG 153.741729
HUF 399.552391
IDR 19071.467938
ILS 3.932418
IMP 0.859549
INR 100.42333
IQD 1534.520839
IRR 49374.697814
ISK 142.632717
JEP 0.859549
JMD 186.965829
JOD 0.830996
JPY 171.662789
KES 151.353273
KGS 102.50019
KHR 4703.320609
KMF 492.866506
KPW 1054.887442
KRW 1606.204357
KWD 0.358088
KYD 0.976246
KZT 608.664635
LAK 25235.312355
LBP 104954.373784
LKR 352.147776
LRD 234.874398
LSL 20.83412
LTL 3.460905
LVL 0.708992
LYD 6.327413
MAD 10.549551
MDL 19.826482
MGA 5173.708462
MKD 61.489079
MMK 2460.487866
MNT 4206.445893
MOP 9.471986
MRU 46.52222
MUR 52.873493
MVR 18.052229
MWK 2031.216568
MXN 21.856928
MYR 4.970875
MZN 74.968234
NAD 20.833587
NGN 1794.167808
NIO 43.108313
NOK 11.826972
NPR 160.52679
NZD 1.949616
OMR 0.450677
PAB 1.171376
PEN 4.176592
PGK 4.91211
PHP 66.194916
PKR 333.027701
PLN 4.244522
PYG 9335.806403
QAR 4.27058
RON 5.069803
RSD 117.18064
RUB 91.778583
RWF 1692.713768
SAR 4.396117
SBD 9.771706
SCR 17.196327
SDG 703.84246
SEK 11.165263
SGD 1.499356
SHP 0.921086
SLE 26.375943
SLL 24578.348051
SOS 669.49157
SRD 43.663636
STD 24260.096439
SVC 10.249711
SYP 15239.485159
SZL 20.825675
THB 38.140707
TJS 11.251497
TMT 4.11407
TND 3.416217
TOP 2.745174
TRY 46.91166
TTD 7.947336
TWD 34.106107
TZS 3097.49837
UAH 48.929234
UGX 4210.843438
USD 1.1721
UYU 47.033607
UZS 14849.19587
VES 130.433887
VND 30632.824534
VUV 139.27358
WST 3.212126
XAF 655.165869
XAG 0.031919
XAU 0.000352
XCD 3.167658
XDR 0.814174
XOF 655.171452
XPF 119.331742
YER 283.823824
ZAR 20.838795
ZMK 10550.307503
ZMW 28.376251
ZWL 377.415611
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%

US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning
US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning

US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning

A divided US Supreme Court heard arguments on Monday in an environmental regulation case with potentially far-reaching implications for the Biden administration's fight against climate change.

Text size:

The case concerns the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants, which produce nearly 20 percent of the electricity in the United States.

As the Supreme Court was hearing arguments, the United Nations issued a landmark report containing dire warnings over climate change.

While the three liberal justices on the nine-member Supreme Court appeared largely to support arguments that the EPA was operating within its brief, several of the conservative justices appeared skeptical.

"This agency is doing greenhouse gas regulation," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the liberal members of the court. "This is in, you know, exactly in its wheelhouse."

Jacob Roth, arguing for The North America Coal Corp., said the EPA is going beyond its remit.

"The agency is asking questions like: Should we phase out the coal industry? Should we build more solar farms in this country? Should we restrict how consumers use electricity in order to bring down emissions?

"Those are not the types of questions we expect the agency to be answering," Roth said.

In 2007, the Supreme Court, by a narrow majority, ruled that the EPA has the power to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from power plants under the Clean Air Act of 1970.

In 2015, Democratic president Barack Obama unveiled his Clean Power Plan, which was intended to combat global warming by reducing carbon dioxide emissions from coal- and gas-burning plants and shifting energy production to clean sources such as solar and wind power.

The Clean Power Plan was blocked in the Supreme Court in 2016 and repealed by former Republican president Donald Trump, who replaced it with his own industry-friendly Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule.

Trump, a climate change skeptic hostile to government regulation of industry, also nominated three justices to the Supreme Court, giving conservatives a 6-3 majority.

- 'Constrain EPA authority' -

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia threw out Trump's ACE rule on the last day of his presidency, setting the stage for the case currently before the Supreme Court: West Virginia vs EPA.

West Virginia and several other coal-producing states asked the Supreme Court to intervene and define the powers of the EPA. The case has also been embraced by opponents of strong government regulatory authority.

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing before the court for the Biden administration, said the justices should just wait until the EPA publishes its new rules.

"The DC Circuit's judgment leaves no EPA rule in effect," Prelogar said. "No federal regulation will occur until EPA completes its upcoming rulemaking.

"Petitioners aren't harmed by the status quo," she said. "Instead, what they seek from this court is a decision to constrain EPA authority in the upcoming rulemaking."

In its brief to the court, West Virginia accused the EPA of acting like "the country's central energy planning authority."

Justice Samuel Alito, one of the more conservative members of the court, questioned how far the EPA could go in regulating emissions.

"Is there any reason EPA couldn't force the adoption of a system for single family homes that is similar to what it has done, what it is claiming it can do, with respect to existing power plants?" Alito asked.

Prelogar, the solicitor general, replied that the EPA "has never listed homes as a source category and couldn't do so because they are far too diverse and differentiated."

UN experts, in the report issued Monday on the global impacts of climate change, said humanity is perilously close to missing its chance to secure a "liveable" future.

"The cumulative scientific evidence is unequivocal: Climate change is a threat to human wellbeing and planetary health," the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said.

Any further delay in global action to cut carbon pollution and prepare for impacts already in the pipeline "will miss a brief and rapidly closing window of opportunity to secure a liveable and sustainable future for all," the 195-nation IPCC warned.

The Supreme Court is expected to issue its decision in West Virginia vs EPA before June.

W.O.Ludwig--NZN