Zürcher Nachrichten - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.308577
AFN 73.899024
ALL 95.423026
AMD 432.388367
ANG 2.099521
AOA 1076.807351
ARS 1624.573896
AUD 1.623721
AWG 2.114319
AZN 1.996886
BAM 1.953897
BBD 2.362409
BDT 144.180176
BGN 1.956671
BHD 0.442629
BIF 3489.65253
BMD 1.172992
BND 1.493152
BOB 8.105105
BRL 5.764203
BSD 1.172962
BTN 112.108279
BWP 15.832646
BYN 3.27942
BYR 22990.651961
BZD 2.359002
CAD 1.608537
CDF 2609.908091
CHF 0.916899
CLF 0.027251
CLP 1072.537512
CNY 7.967079
CNH 7.969299
COP 4442.732353
CRC 535.280891
CUC 1.172992
CUP 31.0843
CVE 110.553998
CZK 24.343115
DJF 208.464412
DKK 7.471604
DOP 69.322749
DZD 155.140001
EGP 62.055638
ERN 17.594887
ETB 184.159552
FJD 2.566214
FKP 0.859307
GBP 0.867838
GEL 3.132343
GGP 0.859307
GHS 13.248227
GIP 0.859307
GMD 86.214416
GNF 10298.87399
GTQ 8.949321
GYD 245.390977
HKD 9.183364
HNL 31.22547
HRK 7.533194
HTG 153.241388
HUF 358.026037
IDR 20548.657635
ILS 3.418041
IMP 0.859307
INR 112.266227
IQD 1536.620106
IRR 1538966.089968
ISK 143.620957
JEP 0.859307
JMD 185.33947
JOD 0.831672
JPY 185.0032
KES 151.492258
KGS 102.578601
KHR 4703.699674
KMF 492.656472
KPW 1055.714604
KRW 1752.709142
KWD 0.361457
KYD 0.977435
KZT 544.042395
LAK 25753.048906
LBP 105470.888064
LKR 378.862584
LRD 214.80428
LSL 19.413213
LTL 3.463542
LVL 0.709531
LYD 7.41912
MAD 10.717047
MDL 20.07419
MGA 4897.243541
MKD 61.645129
MMK 2462.05689
MNT 4200.310344
MOP 9.458047
MRU 46.93151
MUR 54.790792
MVR 18.035513
MWK 2042.179871
MXN 20.242524
MYR 4.614569
MZN 74.965454
NAD 19.412952
NGN 1609.216324
NIO 43.052047
NOK 10.785267
NPR 179.373046
NZD 1.973759
OMR 0.451011
PAB 1.172957
PEN 4.026829
PGK 5.10281
PHP 72.154871
PKR 326.825028
PLN 4.252807
PYG 7160.056269
QAR 4.276145
RON 5.203626
RSD 117.389502
RUB 86.598394
RWF 1714.914957
SAR 4.403314
SBD 9.417967
SCR 16.301448
SDG 704.379728
SEK 10.912994
SGD 1.492973
SHP 0.875757
SLE 28.884915
SLL 24597.06062
SOS 670.369152
SRD 43.699245
STD 24278.57539
STN 24.896765
SVC 10.263003
SYP 129.650179
SZL 19.4253
THB 38.013421
TJS 10.966918
TMT 4.105474
TND 3.369128
TOP 2.824285
TRY 53.253152
TTD 7.96028
TWD 37.023741
TZS 3040.985921
UAH 51.552505
UGX 4408.705701
USD 1.172992
UYU 46.644566
UZS 14251.858209
VES 591.520807
VND 30895.448061
VUV 138.792513
WST 3.177983
XAF 655.318687
XAG 0.013806
XAU 0.000251
XCD 3.170071
XCG 2.11395
XDR 0.813306
XOF 652.769344
XPF 119.331742
YER 279.934391
ZAR 19.415312
ZMK 10558.34087
ZMW 22.080493
ZWL 377.703089
  • RBGPF

    -2.6100

    61

    -4.28%

  • RYCEF

    -0.7100

    16.08

    -4.42%

  • CMSC

    -0.0200

    23.1

    -0.09%

  • GSK

    1.1200

    50.93

    +2.2%

  • RIO

    1.7500

    109.65

    +1.6%

  • CMSD

    -0.0100

    23.6

    -0.04%

  • BCE

    0.2450

    24.525

    +1%

  • RELX

    -0.4700

    32.8

    -1.43%

  • BCC

    -1.2400

    67.96

    -1.82%

  • NGG

    0.3200

    87.48

    +0.37%

  • BTI

    3.0780

    63.518

    +4.85%

  • JRI

    0.0170

    13.147

    +0.13%

  • VOD

    -1.2600

    15.06

    -8.37%

  • BP

    0.1750

    44.395

    +0.39%

  • AZN

    2.7800

    184.64

    +1.51%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

J.Hasler--NZN