Zürcher Nachrichten - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.35335
AFN 77.050797
ALL 96.614026
AMD 452.873985
ANG 2.121943
AOA 1087.00321
ARS 1723.800654
AUD 1.702936
AWG 2.136666
AZN 2.019869
BAM 1.955248
BBD 2.406031
BDT 145.978765
BGN 1.990709
BHD 0.449191
BIF 3539.115218
BMD 1.18539
BND 1.512879
BOB 8.254703
BRL 6.231008
BSD 1.194568
BTN 109.699013
BWP 15.630651
BYN 3.402439
BYR 23233.647084
BZD 2.402531
CAD 1.615035
CDF 2684.909135
CHF 0.915901
CLF 0.026011
CLP 1027.058063
CNY 8.240537
CNH 8.248946
COP 4354.94563
CRC 591.535401
CUC 1.18539
CUP 31.412839
CVE 110.234327
CZK 24.334287
DJF 212.720809
DKK 7.470097
DOP 74.383698
DZD 153.702477
EGP 55.903178
ERN 17.780852
ETB 185.572763
FJD 2.613371
FKP 0.863571
GBP 0.865754
GEL 3.194674
GGP 0.863571
GHS 12.974143
GIP 0.863571
GMD 86.533903
GNF 10372.164298
GTQ 9.16245
GYD 249.920458
HKD 9.257838
HNL 31.365884
HRK 7.536597
HTG 156.336498
HUF 381.328619
IDR 19883.141804
ILS 3.663335
IMP 0.863571
INR 108.679593
IQD 1553.453801
IRR 49934.560565
ISK 144.985527
JEP 0.863571
JMD 187.197911
JOD 0.840489
JPY 183.433247
KES 152.915746
KGS 103.662825
KHR 4768.236408
KMF 491.93733
KPW 1066.928941
KRW 1719.752641
KWD 0.36382
KYD 0.995519
KZT 600.800289
LAK 25485.888797
LBP 101410.128375
LKR 369.427204
LRD 219.593979
LSL 19.132649
LTL 3.500149
LVL 0.717031
LYD 7.495914
MAD 10.835985
MDL 20.092409
MGA 5260.173275
MKD 61.631889
MMK 2489.287708
MNT 4228.659246
MOP 9.606327
MRU 47.30937
MUR 53.852723
MVR 18.32658
MWK 2059.023112
MXN 20.70407
MYR 4.672854
MZN 75.580924
NAD 18.967522
NGN 1643.520192
NIO 43.508231
NOK 11.437875
NPR 175.519161
NZD 1.96876
OMR 0.458133
PAB 1.194573
PEN 3.994177
PGK 5.066955
PHP 69.837307
PKR 331.998194
PLN 4.215189
PYG 8001.773454
QAR 4.316051
RON 5.097064
RSD 117.111851
RUB 90.544129
RWF 1742.915022
SAR 4.446506
SBD 9.544303
SCR 17.200951
SDG 713.016537
SEK 10.580086
SGD 1.505332
SHP 0.88935
SLE 28.834661
SLL 24857.038036
SOS 677.454816
SRD 45.104693
STD 24535.182964
STN 24.493185
SVC 10.452048
SYP 13109.911225
SZL 19.132635
THB 37.411351
TJS 11.151397
TMT 4.148866
TND 3.37248
TOP 2.854135
TRY 51.47818
TTD 8.110743
TWD 37.456003
TZS 3052.380052
UAH 51.199753
UGX 4270.811618
USD 1.18539
UYU 46.357101
UZS 14603.874776
VES 410.075543
VND 30749.020682
VUV 141.680176
WST 3.213481
XAF 655.774526
XAG 0.014004
XAU 0.000244
XCD 3.203577
XCG 2.153028
XDR 0.815573
XOF 655.774526
XPF 119.331742
YER 282.508153
ZAR 19.136335
ZMK 10669.938133
ZMW 23.443477
ZWL 381.695147
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RBGPF

    1.3800

    83.78

    +1.65%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    24.05

    -0.17%

  • BTI

    0.4600

    60.68

    +0.76%

  • RIO

    -4.1000

    91.03

    -4.5%

  • AZN

    0.1800

    92.77

    +0.19%

  • BCE

    0.3700

    25.86

    +1.43%

  • CMSC

    0.0500

    23.76

    +0.21%

  • RELX

    -0.3700

    35.8

    -1.03%

  • GSK

    0.9400

    51.6

    +1.82%

  • NGG

    0.2000

    85.27

    +0.23%

  • RYCEF

    -0.4300

    16

    -2.69%

  • BCC

    0.5100

    80.81

    +0.63%

  • VOD

    -0.0600

    14.65

    -0.41%

  • BP

    -0.1600

    37.88

    -0.42%

  • JRI

    0.1400

    13.08

    +1.07%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

J.Hasler--NZN