Zürcher Nachrichten - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.184217
AFN 71.778596
ALL 94.26058
AMD 418.558169
ANG 2.039871
AOA 1044.771654
ARS 1684.037898
AUD 1.652409
AWG 2.052229
AZN 1.941395
BAM 1.955605
BBD 2.29677
BDT 140.265982
BGN 1.926481
BHD 0.429957
BIF 3386.861518
BMD 1.139336
BND 1.475553
BOB 7.880212
BRL 5.89839
BSD 1.140386
BTN 107.036303
BWP 15.497451
BYN 3.307369
BYR 22330.988246
BZD 2.293471
CAD 1.616661
CDF 2583.449152
CHF 0.922361
CLF 0.026741
CLP 1051.03496
CNY 7.745378
CNH 7.752824
COP 3917.408495
CRC 517.748256
CUC 1.139336
CUP 30.192408
CVE 110.253981
CZK 24.27816
DJF 203.069705
DKK 7.480658
DOP 67.003304
DZD 152.015808
EGP 56.43136
ERN 17.090042
ETB 183.850126
FJD 2.581854
FKP 0.861788
GBP 0.863068
GEL 3.01359
GGP 0.861788
GHS 12.857715
GIP 0.861788
GMD 83.171943
GNF 9992.001402
GTQ 8.700131
GYD 238.656149
HKD 8.935301
HNL 30.511951
HRK 7.539903
HTG 149.045104
HUF 354.163079
IDR 20349.226973
ILS 3.420345
IMP 0.861788
INR 107.508332
IQD 1493.850705
IRR 1566872.020062
ISK 144.115067
JEP 0.861788
JMD 179.602051
JOD 0.807834
JPY 184.293362
KES 147.565252
KGS 99.635383
KHR 4577.542521
KMF 494.472282
KPW 1025.40292
KRW 1749.211811
KWD 0.35275
KYD 0.950305
KZT 553.304703
LAK 25030.498458
LBP 102119.294221
LKR 383.321691
LRD 207.719241
LSL 18.745127
LTL 3.364164
LVL 0.689173
LYD 7.320268
MAD 10.693231
MDL 20.218979
MGA 4823.517939
MKD 61.628841
MMK 2391.906346
MNT 4077.580531
MOP 9.211779
MRU 45.511452
MUR 53.834064
MVR 17.603174
MWK 1977.402379
MXN 19.943172
MYR 4.65765
MZN 72.807828
NAD 18.745127
NGN 1567.875065
NIO 41.965806
NOK 11.31707
NPR 171.257885
NZD 2.017953
OMR 0.438079
PAB 1.140386
PEN 3.888611
PGK 5.0045
PHP 69.855021
PKR 317.362483
PLN 4.291823
PYG 6960.304389
QAR 4.156785
RON 5.244483
RSD 117.36827
RUB 89.906115
RWF 1670.033097
SAR 4.282472
SBD 9.173881
SCR 16.016599
SDG 683.602068
SEK 11.094411
SGD 1.474533
SHP 0.850629
SLE 28.259714
SLL 23891.313258
SOS 651.734866
SRD 42.70578
STD 23581.957684
STN 24.497552
SVC 9.978003
SYP 125.933213
SZL 18.734128
THB 38.028805
TJS 10.554045
TMT 3.987676
TND 3.379962
TOP 2.743248
TRY 53.039861
TTD 7.750225
TWD 36.299026
TZS 2999.100271
UAH 51.186584
UGX 4185.581694
USD 1.139336
UYU 45.775425
UZS 13697.631062
VES 707.246307
VND 29964.540351
VUV 136.297015
WST 3.167398
XAF 655.89145
XAG 0.019435
XAU 0.00028
XCD 3.079113
XCG 2.055195
XDR 0.815718
XOF 655.89145
XPF 119.331742
YER 271.874128
ZAR 19.354809
ZMK 10255.396502
ZMW 20.541947
ZWL 366.865771
  • CMSC

    -0.1160

    21.93

    -0.53%

  • VOD

    0.0300

    13.89

    +0.22%

  • BCE

    -0.2800

    22.92

    -1.22%

  • NGG

    -0.4100

    83.01

    -0.49%

  • GSK

    0.6100

    52.5

    +1.16%

  • RYCEF

    0.3900

    18.39

    +2.12%

  • RBGPF

    3.7000

    65

    +5.69%

  • CMSD

    -0.1600

    21.77

    -0.73%

  • RIO

    -1.3700

    93.74

    -1.46%

  • RELX

    0.4200

    31.34

    +1.34%

  • JRI

    0.2100

    12.79

    +1.64%

  • BCC

    1.2600

    81.02

    +1.56%

  • BP

    -0.5900

    37.13

    -1.59%

  • AZN

    2.7300

    188.41

    +1.45%

  • BTI

    0.2800

    62.76

    +0.45%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

J.Hasler--NZN