Zürcher Nachrichten - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.256969
AFN 73.026624
ALL 95.949668
AMD 436.29849
ANG 2.074968
AOA 1062.937298
ARS 1612.956254
AUD 1.648622
AWG 2.089361
AZN 1.97515
BAM 1.955793
BBD 2.330592
BDT 141.989509
BGN 1.981339
BHD 0.437098
BIF 3425.188147
BMD 1.159146
BND 1.479895
BOB 7.995972
BRL 6.159011
BSD 1.157196
BTN 108.180626
BWP 15.778945
BYN 3.510788
BYR 22719.261378
BZD 2.327292
CAD 1.591102
CDF 2637.057544
CHF 0.913917
CLF 0.027244
CLP 1075.745893
CNY 7.982348
CNH 8.005172
COP 4253.385281
CRC 540.49813
CUC 1.159146
CUP 30.717369
CVE 110.264618
CZK 24.515015
DJF 206.059287
DKK 7.48519
DOP 68.689762
DZD 153.294785
EGP 59.995792
ERN 17.38719
ETB 182.369469
FJD 2.566871
FKP 0.87126
GBP 0.86899
GEL 3.147128
GGP 0.87126
GHS 12.613956
GIP 0.87126
GMD 85.201694
GNF 10142.964899
GTQ 8.863969
GYD 242.099162
HKD 9.082199
HNL 30.628894
HRK 7.547552
HTG 151.809475
HUF 393.739159
IDR 19654.711213
ILS 3.60393
IMP 0.87126
INR 108.971952
IQD 1515.894754
IRR 1525001.44174
ISK 144.047519
JEP 0.87126
JMD 181.799371
JOD 0.82188
JPY 184.582853
KES 149.909481
KGS 101.364887
KHR 4623.983998
KMF 494.955743
KPW 1043.080849
KRW 1744.874492
KWD 0.35536
KYD 0.964297
KZT 556.328075
LAK 24848.914008
LBP 103633.441366
LKR 360.978751
LRD 211.759267
LSL 19.520632
LTL 3.422657
LVL 0.701156
LYD 7.407974
MAD 10.813063
MDL 20.15193
MGA 4824.983303
MKD 61.639787
MMK 2434.137979
MNT 4156.167228
MOP 9.340468
MRU 46.32084
MUR 53.912319
MVR 17.920835
MWK 2006.593056
MXN 20.746631
MYR 4.565921
MZN 74.073751
NAD 19.520632
NGN 1572.092184
NIO 42.579853
NOK 11.093021
NPR 173.089401
NZD 1.985179
OMR 0.445696
PAB 1.157196
PEN 4.000686
PGK 4.994983
PHP 69.723065
PKR 323.078682
PLN 4.282755
PYG 7557.973845
QAR 4.231485
RON 5.101986
RSD 117.449594
RUB 96.003268
RWF 1683.694173
SAR 4.352195
SBD 9.33305
SCR 15.877645
SDG 696.647132
SEK 10.831104
SGD 1.486609
SHP 0.86966
SLE 28.486057
SLL 24306.724357
SOS 661.297712
SRD 43.45349
STD 23991.981659
STN 24.499915
SVC 10.124965
SYP 128.128397
SZL 19.526932
THB 38.14522
TJS 11.114462
TMT 4.068602
TND 3.417588
TOP 2.790945
TRY 51.295112
TTD 7.850973
TWD 37.135217
TZS 3008.589588
UAH 50.693025
UGX 4373.984863
USD 1.159146
UYU 46.629839
UZS 14107.951178
VES 527.05282
VND 30499.449254
VUV 138.346896
WST 3.161587
XAF 655.95473
XAG 0.017051
XAU 0.000257
XCD 3.13265
XCG 2.085493
XDR 0.815797
XOF 655.95473
XPF 119.331742
YER 276.576393
ZAR 19.85325
ZMK 10433.709028
ZMW 22.593922
ZWL 373.244535
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • GSK

    -0.5300

    51.84

    -1.02%

  • RIO

    -2.5000

    83.15

    -3.01%

  • CMSC

    -0.2000

    22.65

    -0.88%

  • BTI

    -1.3500

    57.37

    -2.35%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    25.79

    +0.23%

  • RELX

    -0.4600

    33.36

    -1.38%

  • BCC

    -1.5600

    68.3

    -2.28%

  • NGG

    -3.5400

    81.99

    -4.32%

  • BP

    -1.0800

    44.78

    -2.41%

  • RYCEF

    -1.2600

    15.34

    -8.21%

  • CMSD

    -0.2420

    22.658

    -1.07%

  • AZN

    -5.3300

    183.6

    -2.9%

  • VOD

    -0.0900

    14.33

    -0.63%

  • JRI

    -0.3900

    11.77

    -3.31%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

J.Hasler--NZN