Zürcher Nachrichten - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.291256
AFN 77.119825
ALL 92.234313
AMD 426.800065
ANG 2.091333
AOA 1071.499959
ARS 1749.460243
AUD 1.64083
AWG 2.103271
AZN 2.001602
BAM 1.954995
BBD 2.354951
BDT 142.883624
BGN 1.982176
BHD 0.44053
BIF 3485.003411
BMD 1.168484
BND 1.486233
BOB 13.487794
BRL 6.069457
BSD 1.169254
BTN 111.845306
BWP 15.698008
BYN 3.556412
BYR 22902.28562
BZD 2.351602
CAD 1.610352
CDF 2658.300802
CHF 0.934986
CLF 0.027396
CLP 1078.242268
CNY 7.85601
CNH 7.856995
COP 3594.665631
CRC 529.793231
CUC 1.168484
CUP 30.964825
CVE 110.801476
CZK 24.133051
DJF 207.662808
DKK 7.475612
DOP 68.952309
DZD 155.457431
EGP 59.452345
ERN 17.527259
ETB 190.988078
FJD 2.568153
FKP 0.858853
GBP 0.856692
GEL 3.043849
GGP 0.858853
GHS 12.999399
GIP 0.858853
GMD 85.298872
GNF 10256.368751
GTQ 8.92248
GYD 244.525612
HKD 9.165021
HNL 31.351764
HRK 7.532866
HTG 152.971607
HUF 364.805041
IDR 20765.829548
ILS 3.502706
IMP 0.858853
INR 111.908689
IQD 1531.702202
IRR 1606168.838985
ISK 141.994368
JEP 0.858853
JMD 184.987011
JOD 0.828464
JPY 185.805356
KES 151.224989
KGS 102.182868
KHR 4726.517937
KMF 493.099964
KPW 1051.635907
KRW 1623.573233
KWD 0.360162
KYD 0.974428
KZT 532.832045
LAK 26261.677199
LBP 104637.738518
LKR 385.791083
LRD 212.225921
LSL 18.859344
LTL 3.450229
LVL 0.706804
LYD 7.425726
MAD 10.812858
MDL 20.076336
MGA 4997.071109
MKD 61.555236
MMK 2453.358726
MNT 4204.670467
MOP 9.446294
MRU 46.891363
MUR 54.509918
MVR 18.0645
MWK 2029.656716
MXN 19.805217
MYR 4.727659
MZN 74.671968
NAD 18.859537
NGN 1575.396529
NIO 43.033205
NOK 10.92255
NPR 178.951924
NZD 1.962994
OMR 0.44928
PAB 1.169249
PEN 3.919124
PGK 5.256926
PHP 72.1311
PKR 324.341877
PLN 4.317776
PYG 7040.252307
QAR 4.262309
RON 5.250701
RSD 117.362721
RUB 96.751774
RWF 1718.743912
SAR 4.389565
SBD 9.385565
SCR 16.06023
SDG 702.847351
SEK 11.077374
SGD 1.485838
SHP 0.86569
SLE 28.752611
SLL 24502.5235
SOS 668.236339
SRD 44.040449
STD 24185.258817
STN 24.490651
SVC 10.231138
SYP 15192.628341
SZL 18.8618
THB 38.361352
TJS 10.80383
TMT 4.089694
TND 3.400873
TOP 2.813429
TRY 56.157453
TTD 7.923907
TWD 37.223115
TZS 3091.227745
UAH 52.155022
UGX 4349.24673
USD 1.168484
UYU 46.862312
UZS 13843.774721
VES 907.262769
VND 30499.76833
VUV 138.133654
WST 3.189114
XAF 655.7067
XAG 0.017149
XAU 0.000258
XCD 3.157887
XCG 2.107278
XDR 0.826179
XOF 655.71231
XPF 119.331742
YER 277.018334
ZAR 18.832216
ZMK 10517.762517
ZMW 22.069103
ZWL 376.251358
  • RBGPF

    0.3500

    69.35

    +0.5%

  • CMSC

    -0.0799

    21.28

    -0.38%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    21.12

    -0.14%

  • BCC

    -1.3600

    81.77

    -1.66%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1800

    20.42

    -0.88%

  • BCE

    0.0800

    23.78

    +0.34%

  • JRI

    0.0300

    12.41

    +0.24%

  • VOD

    -0.1600

    16.01

    -1%

  • NGG

    -0.0400

    80.62

    -0.05%

  • RELX

    0.2800

    35.38

    +0.79%

  • RIO

    1.7300

    102.17

    +1.69%

  • GSK

    -0.9200

    51.96

    -1.77%

  • BTI

    0.7200

    56.7

    +1.27%

  • AZN

    -0.4600

    164.49

    -0.28%

  • BP

    1.4100

    45.14

    +3.12%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

J.Hasler--NZN