Zürcher Nachrichten - Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules

EUR -
AED 4.245913
AFN 76.887634
ALL 93.218842
AMD 422.094755
AOA 1060.176801
ARS 1724.882567
AUD 1.638747
AWG 2.082489
AZN 1.97002
BAM 1.955776
BBD 2.321671
BDT 142.688227
BHD 0.434695
BIF 3451.157116
BMD 1.156136
BND 1.477082
BOB 13.69983
BRL 5.876989
BSD 1.152686
BTN 109.688637
BWP 15.558807
BYN 3.432357
BYR 22660.258427
BZD 2.318271
CAD 1.612983
CDF 2615.761404
CHF 0.93588
CLF 0.026829
CLP 1055.916879
CNY 7.801146
CNH 7.796152
COP 3633.55485
CRC 523.993489
CUC 1.156136
CUP 30.637594
CVE 110.26363
CZK 24.258158
DJF 205.267449
DKK 7.477932
DOP 67.289164
DZD 152.967099
EGP 57.293288
ERN 17.342035
ETB 186.049588
FJD 2.553384
FKP 0.857252
GBP 0.858527
GEL 3.017966
GGP 0.857252
GHS 13.526832
GIP 0.857252
GMD 84.980421
GNF 10123.874202
GTQ 8.794891
GYD 241.157003
HKD 9.066767
HNL 30.895616
HRK 7.536622
HTG 150.718127
HUF 363.096405
IDR 20580.370421
ILS 3.468234
IMP 0.857252
INR 110.076256
IQD 1509.981237
IRR 1590322.371805
ISK 142.598215
JEP 0.857252
JMD 183.057725
JOD 0.819746
JPY 182.445186
KES 149.158147
KGS 101.104505
KHR 4681.941823
KMF 492.514185
KRW 1627.677557
KWD 0.356853
KYD 0.960588
KZT 540.233287
LAK 26025.676609
LBP 103223.017367
LKR 386.635196
LRD 208.057415
LSL 18.726567
LTL 3.413768
LVL 0.699335
LYD 7.331909
MAD 10.743067
MDL 20.044751
MGA 4918.938878
MKD 61.529235
MMK 2427.363841
MNT 4157.293457
MOP 9.314584
MRU 46.338424
MUR 54.419742
MVR 17.862733
MWK 1998.775164
MXN 20.094074
MYR 4.728715
MZN 73.882892
NAD 18.726567
NGN 1577.963717
NIO 42.419473
NOK 10.99759
NPR 175.501819
NZD 1.966719
OMR 0.442445
PAB 1.152686
PEN 3.903651
PGK 5.093937
PHP 70.183258
PKR 320.014324
PLN 4.299905
PYG 6853.914834
QAR 4.213648
RON 5.244583
RSD 117.338542
RUB 94.338828
RWF 1694.978938
SAR 4.329446
SBD 9.325039
SCR 16.705092
SDG 694.263698
SEK 10.961095
SGD 1.467719
SLE 28.445176
SOS 658.791814
SRD 43.778814
STD 23929.673396
STN 24.499696
SVC 10.085875
SZL 18.722767
THB 38.210709
TJS 10.633568
TMT 4.058036
TND 3.386358
TRY 55.144784
TTD 7.812903
TWD 37.286072
TZS 3051.762079
UAH 51.625959
UGX 4293.946644
USD 1.156136
UYU 46.399423
UZS 13785.828699
VES 873.763846
VND 30295.956222
VUV 137.068136
WST 3.160546
XAF 655.948849
XAG 0.018188
XAU 0.000266
XCD 3.124515
XCG 2.077474
XDR 0.81579
XOF 655.948849
XPF 119.331742
YER 275.626884
ZAR 18.667336
ZMK 10406.612213
ZMW 21.75673
ZWL 372.275202
  • CMSD

    -0.1600

    21.82

    -0.73%

  • CMSC

    0.0240

    21.744

    +0.11%

  • RIO

    1.4500

    101.1

    +1.43%

  • BCE

    -0.0200

    22.75

    -0.09%

  • RBGPF

    0.7600

    70.5

    +1.08%

  • GSK

    0.7900

    52.96

    +1.49%

  • RYCEF

    0.2300

    20.85

    +1.1%

  • BCC

    2.3400

    86.6

    +2.7%

  • AZN

    1.4100

    161.42

    +0.87%

  • VOD

    0.1900

    16.19

    +1.17%

  • NGG

    0.4700

    80.88

    +0.58%

  • BP

    -0.6000

    41.63

    -1.44%

  • RELX

    0.0485

    35.52

    +0.14%

  • JRI

    0.1500

    12.81

    +1.17%

  • BTI

    0.6000

    59.33

    +1.01%

Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules
Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules / Photo: Giuseppe CACACE - AFP/File

Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules

The COP28 climate talks have been flooded with announcements hyping controversial carbon credits before rules for them have been hammered out, with environmental groups fearing "greenwashing" on a massive scale.

Text size:

The concept behind the credits has taken a major hit recently as scientific research has repeatedly shown claims of reduced emissions under the schemes are often hugely overestimated -- or simply non-existent.

Carbon credits allow corporations -- or countries under certain conditions -- to offset their greenhouse gas emissions.

One credit equals the reduction or removal of one tonne of CO2 from the atmosphere, often in developing countries by projects focusing on things like fighting deforestation.

Scientists stress that any offsetting should not be used as a passport to continue polluting, with emissions needing to fall by almost half this decade to meet global warming goals.

US climate envoy John Kerry declared on Sunday that his country's Energy Transition Accelerator for developing nations -- one of a number being touted -- as a "bold new idea" .

However environmental groups quickly expressed scepticism, pointing to the past failures of similar schemes.

The initiative -- a partnership between the US government, the Rockefeller Foundation and billionaire Jeff Bezos's Earth Fund -- aims to shift developing countries from dirty to clean fuel.

Under the scheme, companies -- and potentially countries -- will be able to buy credits for carbon emissions from projects that do things like boost renewable energy, build electrical transmission lines or "retire" coal plants.

- 'Smoke and mirrors' -

Amazon, Bank of America, Mastercard, McDonald's, Morgan Stanley, PepsiCo and Walmart are some of the US corporate giants lining up to pilot projects in Chile, the Dominican Republic and Nigeria.

Kerry said the initiative could generate tens of billions of dollars, insisting the credits will be "high integrity" and "not the kind of carbon crediting that you read about in some headlines."

He was referring to a series of investigations in recent months that have raised doubts about the effectiveness and integrity of the vast majority of carbon credits already in circulation.

Erika Lennon, a lawyer for the Center for International Environmental Law, said the announcement was "merely smoke and mirrors distracting from the US's paltry contribution to climate finance".

Washington said it was working with the World Bank to ensure the quality of the credits.

Separately on Friday, the World Bank said it had plans to help 15 developing countries in Africa, Southeast Asia and Latin America to earn money from carbon credits by 2028 for forest protection.

Such projects have previously been shown to be the least reliable for reducing emissions, but the World Bank insisted its scheme would be of "high integrity".

AFP has also identified hundreds of events dedicated to carbon credits at COP28, many led by companies seeking a way to compensate -- at least on paper -- for their carbon footprint.

- Vagueness -

Many different players have rushed to set up their own carbon credit rules, slowing down negotiations for a common regulatory framework, according to environmental groups.

This absence of common rules has given companies free rein to engage in widely-criticised offsetting as part of a voluntary carbon credit market.

At COP28, negotiators have been tasked with looking into applying Article Six of the 2015 Paris Agreement.

It allows countries to cooperate on hitting their emissions-reduction targets -- including by swapping carbon credits.

It also envisages a reform of the global carbon credit market that has been dragging on for years.

The Climate Action Network, which brings together hundreds of environmental groups, was scathing about the lack of ambition.

"Just like last year, we feel the draft (agreement) is more likely to remove ambition from climate action than carbon dioxide from the atmosphere," it added.

The network also criticised the vagueness of planned rules for a future UN supervisory body overseeing a global carbon market, which it said could leave the "door too wide open for risky practices" and to protect the rights of the communities involved.

These contentious rules could still be pushed through by countries impatient to start offsetting their emissions, led by wealthy and oil-producing nations -- and possibly developing countries keen to reap vast sums from the market.

On Friday, around 10 countries including the United States, France and the UAE -- as well as Colombia, Kenya and Senegal -- called for carbon markets to be "complementary" to efforts to reduce emissions.

They said that there must be "transparency" and "high-integrity standards" for these markets to reach their potential.

W.F.Portman--NZN