Zürcher Nachrichten - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

EUR -
AED 4.256248
AFN 76.490971
ALL 92.792124
AMD 422.44687
ANG 2.07427
AOA 1062.75707
ARS 1732.616553
AUD 1.63944
AWG 2.086111
AZN 1.994262
BAM 1.958344
BBD 2.334573
BDT 141.413674
BGN 1.966004
BHD 0.437066
BIF 3463.385781
BMD 1.15895
BND 1.480962
BOB 13.416426
BRL 6.041378
BSD 1.159126
BTN 110.850499
BWP 15.646593
BYN 3.525564
BYR 22715.425801
BZD 2.331218
CAD 1.608574
CDF 2630.817445
CHF 0.939851
CLF 0.027192
CLP 1070.221371
CNY 7.815148
CNH 7.813087
COP 3598.401595
CRC 520.674028
CUC 1.15895
CUP 30.712183
CVE 110.406496
CZK 24.190302
DJF 206.411659
DKK 7.475902
DOP 68.088142
DZD 154.035311
EGP 58.498248
ERN 17.384254
ETB 187.506533
FJD 2.561856
FKP 0.855763
GBP 0.855647
GEL 3.018996
GGP 0.855763
GHS 12.808692
GIP 0.855763
GMD 85.761892
GNF 10182.181139
GTQ 8.841446
GYD 242.506024
HKD 9.090841
HNL 31.078232
HRK 7.534797
HTG 151.620857
HUF 365.893933
IDR 20661.765877
ILS 3.46671
IMP 0.855763
INR 110.922611
IQD 1518.491938
IRR 1593064.10296
ISK 142.214963
JEP 0.855763
JMD 183.15421
JOD 0.821676
JPY 184.55878
KES 150.089338
KGS 101.350078
KHR 4689.211939
KMF 493.712694
KPW 1043.055607
KRW 1619.407026
KWD 0.357872
KYD 0.96595
KZT 535.353031
LAK 26123.155315
LBP 103798.570367
LKR 384.743041
LRD 210.382346
LSL 18.804348
LTL 3.422078
LVL 0.701037
LYD 7.38572
MAD 10.769935
MDL 19.994884
MGA 4992.570729
MKD 61.605015
MMK 2432.921723
MNT 4168.919085
MOP 9.364484
MRU 46.487179
MUR 54.447114
MVR 17.916871
MWK 2009.980023
MXN 19.771605
MYR 4.708772
MZN 74.062734
NAD 18.804267
NGN 1564.860938
NIO 42.647849
NOK 10.899064
NPR 177.360599
NZD 1.974069
OMR 0.445616
PAB 1.159105
PEN 3.903904
PGK 5.208743
PHP 71.65439
PKR 321.689776
PLN 4.326849
PYG 6993.203764
QAR 4.236985
RON 5.242977
RSD 117.314761
RUB 98.39405
RWF 1707.977346
SAR 4.342108
SBD 9.301517
SCR 16.064083
SDG 697.102722
SEK 11.043122
SGD 1.479823
SHP 0.858627
SLE 28.568026
SLL 24302.607335
SOS 662.483328
SRD 44.001839
STD 23987.931215
STN 24.531757
SVC 10.142085
SYP 15068.671639
SZL 18.790731
THB 38.397149
TJS 10.710165
TMT 4.056326
TND 3.394594
TOP 2.790474
TRY 55.554972
TTD 7.860277
TWD 36.971708
TZS 3068.872573
UAH 51.924438
UGX 4323.634381
USD 1.15895
UYU 46.760533
UZS 13700.913572
VES 894.219218
VND 30340.159798
VUV 137.005872
WST 3.14759
XAF 656.832793
XAG 0.018496
XAU 0.000267
XCD 3.132121
XCG 2.08904
XDR 0.819438
XOF 656.821444
XPF 119.331742
YER 274.776137
ZAR 18.842579
ZMK 10431.945789
ZMW 21.646489
ZWL 373.181522
  • RYCEF

    -0.2500

    20.81

    -1.2%

  • CMSC

    -0.1200

    21.24

    -0.56%

  • RBGPF

    0.3500

    69

    +0.51%

  • VOD

    -0.0700

    16.13

    -0.43%

  • NGG

    0.8600

    82.15

    +1.05%

  • BCE

    0.0100

    23.36

    +0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8700

    51.15

    +1.7%

  • BTI

    0.6500

    56.38

    +1.15%

  • RIO

    -0.5200

    96.69

    -0.54%

  • AZN

    3.2100

    160.1

    +2%

  • CMSD

    -0.0900

    21.09

    -0.43%

  • BP

    0.5600

    43.41

    +1.29%

  • BCC

    -1.7600

    80.18

    -2.2%

  • JRI

    -0.0400

    12.44

    -0.32%

  • RELX

    0.9500

    34.51

    +2.75%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: Hugo SALAIS - METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

L.Rossi--NZN